I suppose I would just modify the sentiment to insert a "verification" period when you actually do a little research and background. Then think about it. Then make certain that you come out and explain your basis for calling the person a fraud, making certain that you explain your personal worldview and moral code.
I suppose that the values promulgated from "the values of the divine" is probably one of the most powerful places to stand when calling this kind of thing out. But one must be certain that one clearly states which Divine is being represented in the question being addressed.
Remember that Boniface felling the Donar Oak was exactly along the lines you discussed
no subject
I suppose I would just modify the sentiment to insert a "verification" period when you actually do a little research and background. Then think about it. Then make certain that you come out and explain your basis for calling the person a fraud, making certain that you explain your personal worldview and moral code.
I suppose that the values promulgated from "the values of the divine" is probably one of the most powerful places to stand when calling this kind of thing out. But one must be certain that one clearly states which Divine is being represented in the question being addressed.
Remember that Boniface felling the Donar Oak was exactly along the lines you discussed
I do enjoy reading your stuff.....thanks